Though the legislative councils had no power till 1920 the nationalists used them as tools for growing the national movement.
Indian
members could be nominated to the governor general’s
legislative council but they had no powers. This was done
to ensure Indian views were considered. Also mostly the
Indian members were princes, retired government officials,
zamindars and landlord and didn’t represent the
nationalist community.
They took anti nationalist decisions and opposed the nationalist demands.
The nationalists were able to enhance their political stature and build a national movement while undermining the political and moral influence, of imperialist rule. This helped in generating anti imperialist sentiments among the public.
But, at the same time, the nationalists failed to widen the democratic base of the movement by not including the masses, especially women, and not demanding the right to vote for all.
The
demands of the nationalists weren’t radical but only
towards reforming existing institutions to make them more
democratic. This was since they didn’t want to invite
repression by the government.
The
national agitations led the government to increase the
size of the legislative councils and give them more powers
but this was done to allow the vocal political leaders to
get a chance to let off steam.
While doing so the British underestimated the zeal of the Indian leaders who converted these impotent mechanisms into forums for ventilating popular grievances, exposing bureaucratic administration and criticizing every policy of the colonial government.
The nationalist leaders used these councils to enhance their own political stature and build a national movement. They kept up the political criticism of the government by sheer will, deep knowledge and skilled debating and thus generated a powerful anti imperialist sentiment.
Pherozshah Mehta and GK Gokhale were two most prominent leaders who put the councils to good use and introduced a new spirit in them. Mehta was known for his wit and oratory and was criticized by British but lauded by the Indians. Mehta retired in 1901 and was succeeded by GK Gokhale who proved to a worthy successor.
G.K.
Gokhale was trained by Justice Ranade and G.V. Joshi.
Though he was no orator like Dadabhai Nauroji or Tilak nor
could he use satire as a weapon like Pherozshah Mehta but
his speeches were based on deep study and careful
data.
Hence
they captivated the listener on their intellectual content
alone. Even his opponent Tilak had deep respect for him. Gandhiji
considered him his political guru.
He founded the "Servants of India Society" to train Indians to dedicate lives to cause of their country. He was called the Socrates of Maharashtra.
Score more than 80% marks and move ahead else stay back and read again!