- UPSC Civil Service Examination 1976-2016 Indian Polity II


Ans .

c


  1. Explanation :

    According to Article 131, The SC has original jurisdiction in any dispute - (a) between the Government of India & one or more States; or (b) between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other States on the other; or (c) between two or more States





Ans .

a


  1. Explanation :

    It his administrative capacity he is subject to writ judiciary in (Article 1720–224).





Ans .

c


  1. Explanation :

    Under article 236 of the Constitution, The term "District Judge" includes judge of a city civil court, additional district judge, joint district judge, assistant district judge, chief judge of a small cause court, chief presidency magistrate, additional chief presidency magistrate, sessions judge and assistant sessions judge and additional sessions judge.





Ans .

b


  1. Explanation :

    Assertion and Reason as independent statements are true but does not explain each other.





Ans .

b


  1. Explanation :

    As per provisions under Article 143





Ans .

d


  1. Explanation :

    There are 21 High Courts in India. Six (Bombay, Calcutta, Guwahati, Kerala, Madras and Punjab and Haryana High Court) of them have jurisdiction over more than one state. National Capital Territory of Delhi has High Court of its own.





Ans .

b


  1. Explanation :

    The salaries and allowances of the Judges of the HC are charged to the Consolidated Fund of the state but their pensions are payable as Charged Expenditure /Art 112(3).





Ans .

c


  1. Explanation :

    Such is the prerogative of the Parliament.





Ans .

b


  1. Explanation :

    The U.T. of Andaman and Nicobar Islands comes under the jurisdiction of high court of Calcutta under its extended jurisdiction Act 1953.





Ans .

d


  1. Explanation :

    These provisions are given under Article 233-235 in the chapter of Subordinate Courts in the Constitution of India.





Ans .

c


  1. Explanation :

    According to NHRC Act 1993, only a retired CJI can become chairman of NHRC, appointed by President on the recommendation of a committee comprising of PM, Speaker of Lok Sabha, Home Minister, Leader of Opposition of both Houses of Parliament and Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha





Ans .

b


  1. Explanation :

    President comes first, Vice-President second, Prime Minister third and Governors of states with in their respective State comes fourth in the Warrant of Precedence.
    According to Indian order of precedence,
    Judges of the Supreme Court – Rank 9
    Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha – Rank 10
    Attorney General of India – Rank 11
    Members of Parliament – Rank 21





Ans .

a


  1. Explanation :

    There were 21 High Courts in India with three new states created in 2000, having their own High Courts (Chattisgarh at Bilaspur, Uttarakhand at Nainital and Jharkhand at Ranchi). Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh have a common HC at Chandigarh. In the year 2013, three new High Courts in the northeast - Meghalaya, Manipur and Tripura were created taking the total number of High Courts in the country from 21 to 24. National Capital Territory of Delhi has a High Court of its own which was established in the year 1966.





Ans .

b


  1. Explanation :

    The statement (1) is not correct as according to Article 138(1) of the Constitution, Parliament can enlarge the jurisdiction and powers of the SC w.r.t. to any of the matters in the Union List. Whereas SC’s jurisdiction w.r.t. to any other matter can be enlarged by a special agreement between Government of India and government of the concerned State.





Ans .

d


  1. Explanation :

    Article 214 of the Constitution says–There shall be a High Court for each State. Therefore, Reason (R) is correct. But for twenty-nine states and seven union territories we have only 24 High Courts.





Ans .

d


  1. Explanation :

    PN Bhagwati was CJI during July 1985–Dec 1986. During his tenure as CJI, PIL was introduced to the Indian judicial system.





Ans .

d


  1. Explanation :

    Statement 1 is incorrect because after retirement a permanent judge of High Court shall not plead or act in a Court or before any authority in India, except the SC and a HC other than the HC in which he had held his office (Art 220).
    Statement 2 is incorrect as according to Article 217, a person is not qualified for appointment as a judge of a High Court in India unless he has for at least ten years held a judicial office in the territory of India.





Ans .

a


  1. Explanation :

    Statement 2 is incorrect because after retirement a permanent judge of High Court shall not plead or act in a Court or before any authority in India, except the SC and a HC other than the HC in which he had held his office (Art 220).





Ans .

b


  1. Explanation :

    Bombay HC (Maharashtra & Goa); Guwahati (Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh); Punjab and Haryana HC (Punjab, Haryana)





Ans .

a


  1. Explanation :

    When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court which can be executed as a civil court decree.





Ans .

d


  1. Explanation :

    Cases that are pending in regular courts can be transferred to a Lok Adalat if both the parties agree. These are usually presided over by retired judges, social Activists, or other members of the legal profession. Lok Adalats can deal with any matter falling within the jurisdiction of civil, criminal etc.





Ans .

c


  1. Explanation :

    The Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court includes dispute between the Government of India and one or more States, and dispute between two and more States.





Ans .

c


  1. Explanation :

    Both are correct. Hence the option (c) is right.





Ans .

a


  1. Explanation :

    1st and 3rd are correct statements thus option (a) is right.





Ans .

c


  1. Explanation :

    The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) has been constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to provide free Legal Services to the weaker sections of the society and to organize Lok Adalats for amicable settlement of disputes. In every state, State Legal Services Authority has been constituted to give effect to the policies and directions of the NALSA and to give free legal services to the people and conduct Lok Adalats in the State.